The future of proxy voting and oil

Sep 15, 2021 | RBC Wealth Management


Share

The second quarter of 2021 saw a seismic shift in the way large oil producers will operate going forward.

Electric vehicle being charged

Court cases were lost in Europe and proxy votes went against managements of carbon-intensive industries in the United States, mostly for not specifying how the companies were going to accomplish their carbon emission reduction plans. Because of that, one of the largest Canadian oil producers committed to becoming net-zero by 2050.1

Asset managers are quickly taking the lead to invoke change at companies around the world. For example, Vanguard, BlackRock and StateStreet—which combined vote approximately 25% of all proxies—all committed to net-zero portfolios by 2050, as well as a 50% reduction in emissions by 2030.2

Historically, both Vanguard and BlackRock tended to vote against proposals for companies to make changes to reduce emissions, but since 2021, they have switched to supporting them. Earlier this year, we saw oil companies targeted first—they are the low-hanging fruit—but as the movement grows to  reduce emissions, other sectors like transportation, agriculture and industrials are expected to face additional scrutiny.

Growing interest

Late last year, the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative launched, designed to encourage the asset management industry to commit to a goal of net-zero emissions by 2050. As of August 1, 2021, it had 128 signatories from around the world managing more than $43 trillion of assets.3

Based on the activity earlier this year, we anticipate more climate-related proposals will happen at annual meetings for large and small corporations around the world in the near future. Especially as the number of climate-related catastrophes continue to cause significant loss of lives and money. For example, in 2020, in the U.S. alone, 22 weather-related incidents cost $96 billion and claimed 262 lives.4

Changes needed

Governments around the world are making commitments to slow temperatures from rising 1.5 degrees Celsius, which means changes are needed in the oil industry to comply with those commitments.

Investors are likely to see many changes both in companies and the ESG investing world thanks to proxy voting. For example, industries with high levels of emissions will likely incorporate planning for adaption into a lower carbon world, which has the potential to change earnings reports. Also, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is discussing requiring asset managers to have carbon disclosures. And many more asset managers are indicating they are considering joining the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative. 

With the proxy votes and court cases earlier this year, oil companies are already facing challenges to the traditional business models they use. Climate influence is now a risk all companies are facing with greater impact because asset managers are looking at how companies plan—and accomplish—carbon deductions.

As proxy voters, investors are taking advantage of another way to influence their values. With proxy voting both individually and through asset managers,  they can make a difference in the world.

1. EnergyNow Media: https://energynow.ca/2021/05/suncor-energy-aims-for-net-zero-emission-target-by-2050/, accessed August 1, 2021
2. Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative: https://www.netzeroassetmanagers.org/q-and-a, accessed August 1, 2021
3. Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative: https://www.netzeroassetmanagers.org/q-and-a, accessed August 1, 2021
4. Forbes, “Why this proxy season is a record breaker for climate proposals”: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mindylubber/2021/05/14/why-this-proxy-season-is-a-recordbreaker-for-climate-proposals/?sh=55cc682b54d4, accessed August 1, 2021

Disclaimer:

Due diligence processes do not assure a profit or protect against loss. Like any type of investing, impact and ESG investing involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Investment and insurance products offered through RBC Wealth Management are not insured by the FDIC or any other federal government agency, are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank or any bank affiliate, and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal amount invested.