A Bold Bet That Could Reshape Global Energy Markets—and Destroy Thousands of American Oil Companies in the Process

The whispers coming out of Washington are audacious, almost reckless in their ambition. President Trump has reportedly set his sights on a target that would send shockwaves through the global energy markets: driving oil prices down to $50 per barrel. His weapon of choice? The troubled oil fields of Venezuela, a nation whose petroleum riches have been locked away behind decades of mismanagement and international sanctions.

It’s a strategy that sounds deceptively simple. Take control of Venezuelan oil, flood the market with new supply, and watch prices tumble. But like most things in the labyrinthine world of global energy politics, the reality is far more complex—and potentially catastrophic for many of the very American oil producers Trump claims to champion.

History would suggest the American energy sector seems to be able to withstand nearly unlimited pain. Shale crashes multiple times every cycle, but it keeps sticking around regardless of where price happens to go. Even negative prices and production going to zero during COVID didn’t bankrupt all these independent producers. If the sector losses can be more than offset by the growth elsewhere that lower prices would bring, it might be worth it?

Charlie Munger, Warren Buffetts’s closest business partner, who was a lot savvier business man than any member of the current Trump administration, made some good points that energy independence might be a terrible idea:

“Now if I’m right in this, there are a whole lot of lessons that logically follow: (1) Foreign oil is your friend not your enemy; (2) You want to produce your own assets slow; … (3) The oil in the ground you’re not producing is a national treasure…... running out of hydrocarbons is like running out of civilization.”

Where is the Plan?

The Trump administration’s Venezuela oil gambit is collapsing before it begins --- a spectacular replay of the DOGE disaster. Officials openly admit they’re “winging it” with a makeshift strategy while oil executive flat-out refuse Trump’s fantasy of $100+billion in investments, demanding security guarantees the administration can’t provide. Trump promises an 18-month miracle while experts warn of a 3–10-year plus slog requiring staggering capital that isn’t coming. The brutal reality: a few billion in oil sales, token investments of $5-15 billion instead of the promised hundreds, marginal production gains, and the mythical $50 oil target forever out of reach. Like DOGE’s phantom $2 trillion in saving that delivered currently estimated at under $5 billion while burning an estimated $135 billion, this is governance by delusion – another train wreck of broken promises and shattered credibility.  

The Venezuelan Mirage

Let’s be clear about what we’re really talking about here. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump has confided to aides his belief that efforts to control Venezuelan oil could drive prices to his coveted $50 per barrel target. It’s an enticing vision: Venezuela sitting atop some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, waiting to be unlocked by American know-how and capital.

But here’s the cold, hard truth that punctures this optimistic balloon: Venezuela currently produces a mere 1 million barrels per day. To put that in perspective, the United States pumps out 13.9 million barrels daily. The 30 to 50 million barrels Trump announced seizing would supply America for barely two and a half days. In the grand chess game of global oil markets, Venezuela’s immediate contribution is more pawn than queen.

The real kicker? Bringing Venezuelan production back to meaningful levels—say, 2 million barrels per day—would require a staggering $110 billion in capital investment. The Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA admits its pipelines haven’t been updated in half a century, with modernization costs alone hitting $58 billion. This isn’t a matter of turning a valve and watching the oil flow. This is years, perhaps a decade, of painstaking infrastructure reconstruction.

The Timeline of Pain

So when might we actually see $50 oil? If everything goes according to plan—which in geopolitics, it rarely does—modest downward pressure could materialize within six to twelve months. But sustained $50 oil? That’s a two-to-five-year proposition at minimum, contingent on Venezuelan infrastructure restoration succeeding beyond most expert expectations and global oversupply continuing unabated.

The commodity trading firm Trafigura’s chief economist has predicted the oil market faces a “super glut” of supply that could drive prices even lower. Combined with Venezuelan production potentially ramping up and OPEC+ discipline crumbling, the perfect storm for cheap oil could indeed materialize. But at what cost?

The American Carnage

Here’s where Trump’s oil price war becomes a friendly fire disaster. While the President celebrates cheaper gas prices for consumers, the American oil industry—particularly the smaller producers who form the backbone of the shale revolution—would face an existential crisis.

The numbers tell a brutal story. The Permian Basin, America’s crown jewel of oil production, has breakeven prices around $62 for new wells. ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance has been blunt about the implications, warning that U.S. shale production will plateau in the low $60s and actively decline at prices in the $50s. At $50 per barrel, analysts project U.S. oil rig counts could plummet to just 360, triggering a 700,000 barrel per day production drop by the fourth quarter of 2026.

The major players—ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips—might survive. They have the financial cushion to halt new drilling while continuing to pump from existing wells profitably, with breakeven prices around $31 for wells already in production. They’ll hunker down, maintain dividends, and wait out the storm.

But what about the hundreds of small and mid-sized independent producers? These companies, many of them family-owned operations or small public entities, face financial annihilation below $60 oil. At $50 per barrel, we’re talking about a wave of bankruptcies that would make the 2015-2016 oil crash look like a minor correction. Entire communities in Texas, Oklahoma, and North Dakota would watch their economic engines sputter and die.

The cruel irony? As breakeven prices are projected to climb from $70 to $95 per barrel by 2035—as operators exhaust the most economically attractive drilling locations—the industry needs higher prices to maintain production, not lower ones. Trump’s $50 target doesn’t just threaten current producers; it would strangle the future investment needed to keep America energy independent.

Global Tremors

While American producers bleed, how would the rest of the world’s oil powers respond to this new reality?

**The Middle East would face its own reckoning.** Saudi Arabia can produce oil for $3 to $5 per barrel, making them the world’s lowest-cost producer. But here’s the catch: their government needs $96 per barrel to balance its budget. At $50 oil, the Kingdom would face massive deficits, forcing painful cuts to the lavish social programs that keep the population content and the Vision 2030 transformation funded. The UAE’s fiscal breakeven sits at $57, while Qatar needs $50—they’d be scraping by at subsistence levels.

**Russia would be squeezed but not crushed.** With production costs approaching $50 per barrel for new fields and a fiscal breakeven around $40 to $41, Russia could technically keep pumping. But combined with ongoing Western sanctions, $50 oil would represent a financial vise tightening around Putin’s ability to fund his war machine and maintain domestic stability. It’s economic warfare by another name.

**Iran, already struggling under “maximum pressure” sanctions**, would see its shadow market revenues evaporate further, potentially destabilizing the regime but also making it more unpredictable and dangerous.

**Brazil and Mexico**, with their higher-cost offshore and mature field production, would watch investment flee and production decline, potentially creating political instability in two of America’s crucial hemispheric partners.

The OPEC+ Implosion

Perhaps the most dramatic consequence would be the potential disintegration of OPEC+, the cartel that has managed global oil supplies for decades. Compliance with production quotas has already dropped to 85% in the first quarter of 2025, with Kazakhstan, Iraq, and Russia pumping an extra 2.1 million barrels per day beyond their agreed limits. At $50 oil, the incentive to cheat becomes overwhelming.

Saudi Arabia has historically played the role of “swing producer,” cutting its own production to support prices even as other cartel members’ cheat. But Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has indicated Saudi Arabia won’t sacrifice indefinitely. If prices collapse to $50, we could witness a market share war reminiscent of 2014-2016, when the Saudis opened the taps to punish American shale producers and reassert dominance.

The result? A chaotic free-for-all where every producer pumps at maximum capacity, driving prices even lower in a desperate race to capture market share and generate revenue. It’s the prisoner’s dilemma playing out on a global scale, and everyone loses.

The Investment Drought and Future Supply Crisis

Here’s the part that keeps energy analysts awake at night: at $50 per barrel, upstream investment would collapse globally. Exploration budgets would be slashed, major projects delayed or cancelled, and the next generation of oil supply would simply never materialize.

Oil fields naturally decline at rates of 5-7% annually without continuous investment. Maintaining production requires constant drilling of new wells and development of new fields. At $50 oil, that investment grinds to a halt. The consequence? In three to five years, just as demand potentially recovers, the world could face severe supply shortages and price spikes that make today’s $60 to $70 oil look like a bargain.

Technology improvements have made producers more efficient, allowing them to extract more crude for every dollar spent. But physics and geology still matter. The easy oil is largely gone. What remains requires higher prices to justify the investment.

The Verdict

Can Trump drive oil to $50 per barrel? Technically, yes. A combination of Venezuelan production increases, continued OPEC+ overproduction, weak global demand, and aggressive U.S. diplomacy could create market conditions that push prices to that level.

But should he? That’s a far more complicated question.

The strategy would deliver short-term political wins through lower gas prices, kneecap geopolitical adversaries like Russia and Iran, and potentially pressure Saudi Arabia and OPEC into submission. Those are not insignificant benefits.

Yet the collateral damage could be severe. Thousands of American oil companies would fail. Hundreds of thousands of well-paying jobs in oil-producing states could disappear. U.S. energy independence—achieved through massive private sector investment over the past fifteen years—could be undermined. And the seeds of a future supply crisis could be planted, virtually guaranteeing price spikes down the road that could make today’s energy costs look modest.

Trump’s $50 barrel gambit is less a carefully calibrated energy policy than a high-stakes bet that the short-term political benefits outweigh the long-term economic risks. It’s a wager that might pay off at the ballot box but could prove devastating for the very American energy industry he claims to champion.

In the ruthless calculus of global energy markets, there are no easy answers. But one thing is certain: if oil does hit $50 per barrel, the world that emerges on the other side will look dramatically different than the one we know today. And not everyone—perhaps not even most people—will be better off for the journey.

John Vidas

January 2026

This information is not investment advice and should be used only in conjunction with a discussion with your RBC Dominion Securities Inc. Investment Advisor.  This will ensure that your own circumstances have been considered properly and that any action is taken based upon the latest available information. The strategies and advice in this report are provided for general guidance.  Readers should consult their own Investment Advisor when planning to implement a strategy. Interest rates, market conditions, special offers, tax rulings, and other investment factors are subject to change. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable at the time obtained but neither RBC Dominion Securities Inc. nor its employees, agents, or information suppliers can guarantee its accuracy or completeness.  This report is not and under no circumstances is to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.  This report is furnished on the basis and understanding that neither RBC Dominion Securities Inc. nor its employees, agents, or information suppliers is to be under any responsibility or liability whatsoever in respect thereof.   The inventories of RBC Dominion Securities Inc. may from time to time include securities mentioned herein.